{"id":8548,"date":"2018-11-14T21:22:20","date_gmt":"2018-11-15T05:22:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/?p=8548"},"modified":"2025-12-20T21:23:22","modified_gmt":"2025-12-21T05:23:22","slug":"election-update-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/2018\/11\/14\/election-update-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Election Update"},"content":{"rendered":"

PR Pond]<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nDate:11\/14\/18, Time:16:35:56
\nRegistered Voters 121192 –\u00a0Cards Cast 8700971.79%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nDate:11\/09\/18, Time:16:44:02
\nRegistered Voters 121192 –\u00a0Cards Cast 8174367.45%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nDate:11\/07\/18, Time: 01:19:39
\nRegistered Voters 121192 –\u00a0Cards Cast 6482453.49%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL REPORT
\nDate:11\/06\/18, Time:20:12:33
\nRegistered Voters 121192 –\u00a0Cards Cast 4869740.18%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

El Dorado Union High School District<\/strong><\/u>, Governing Board Member Total
\n\u00a0Top 3 Win<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 69122\/94720\u00a073.0 %
\nTIMOTHY M. CARY<\/strong>\u00a026527 21.73%
\nDELOY LINK 20522 16.81%
\nJOE FERGERSON 18072 14.81%
\nTRISHA WILKINS<\/strong>\u00a024469 20.05%
\nDALLAS SWEENEY 9675 7.93%
\nKEVIN BROWN<\/strong>\u00a022219 18.20%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTotal Votes 114537\/94720\u00a068.2 %<\/strong>
\nTIMOTHY M. CARY 25072 21.89%<\/strong>
\nDELOY LINK 19144 16.71%
\nJOE FERGERSON 16927 14.78%
\nTRISHA WILKINS 22937 20.03%<\/strong>
\nDALLAS SWEENEY 9056 7.91%
\nKEVIN BROWN 20873 18.22%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\n51772\/94720\u00a054.7 %<\/strong>
\nTIMOTHY M. CARY 20825 22.45%<\/strong>
\nDELOY LINK 15067 16.25%
\nJOE FERGERSON 13602 14.67%
\nTRISHA WILKINS 18526 19.97%<\/strong>
\nDALLAS SWEENEY 7368 7.94%
\nKEVIN BROWN 16972 18.30%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 39731\/94720\u00a041.9\u00a0<\/strong>%
\nTotal Votes 72166
\nTIMOTHY M. CARY 16593 22.99%<\/strong>
\nDELOY LINK 11587 16.06%
\nJOE FERGERSON 10423 14.44%
\nTRISHA WILKINS 14467 20.05%<\/strong>
\nDALLAS SWEENEY 5593 7.75%
\nKEVIN BROWN 13228 18.33%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Mother Lode Union School District<\/strong><\/u>, Governing Board Member Total
\nTop 3 win<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 7595\/10491\u00a072.4 %<\/strong>
\nCHARLES RICHARDS 2303 20.09%
\nALAN PRIESTLEY 2853 24.89%
\nJANET VANDER LINDEN 3226 28.15%
\nCHUCK WOLFE 3033 26.46<\/strong>%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 7044\/10491\u00a067.1 %<\/strong>
\nCHARLES RICHARDS 2149 20.11%
\nALAN PRIESTLEY 2649 24.79%
\nJANET VANDER LINDEN 3016 28.22%
\nCHUCK WOLFE 2829 26.47%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 5758\/10491\u00a054.9 %<\/strong>
\nCHARLES RICHARDS 1724 19.29%
\nALAN PRIESTLEY 2236 25.02%<\/strong>
\nJANET VANDER LINDEN 2559 28.64%
\nCHUCK WOLFE 2390 26.75%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 4588\/10491 43.7 %
\nTotal Votes 7205
\nCHARLES RICHARDS 1347\u00a018.70%<\/strong>
\nALAN PRIESTLEY 1788 24.82%<\/strong>
\nJANET VANDER LINDEN 2096 29.09%
\nCHUCK WOLFE 1953 27.11%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

County Supervisor – 4th District<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 1 wins<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 18905\/25204\u00a075.0 %
\nMICHAEL RANALLI 8066 48.20%
\nLORI PARLIN 8624 51.53%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 17325\/25204\u00a068.7 %<\/strong>
\nMICHAEL RANALLI 7449 48.33%
\nLORI PARLIN 7923 51.40%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 14081\/25204\u00a055.9 %<\/strong>
\nMICHAEL RANALLI 6095 48.43%
\nLORI PARLIN 6455 51.29%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 10745\/25204\u00a042.6 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 9649
\nMICHAEL RANALLI 4627 47.95%
\nLORI PARLIN 4998 51.80%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

County Supervisor – 5th District<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 1 wins<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 13505\/20896\u00a064.6 %<\/strong>
\nKENNY CURTZWILER 5661 46.44%
\nSUE NOVASEL 6473 53.11%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 12776\/20896\u00a061.1 %<\/strong>
\nKENNY CURTZWILER 5377 46.48%
\nSUE NOVASEL 6140 53.07%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 9861\/20896\u00a047.2 %<\/strong>
\nKENNY CURTZWILER 4226 47.18%
\nSUE NOVASEL 4690 52.36%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 6691\/20896\u00a032.0 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 6086
\nKENNY CURTZWILER 2828 46.47%
\nSUE NOVASEL 3231 53.09%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

County Recorder-Clerk<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 1 wins<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nJANELLE K. HORNE 43105 58.58%<\/strong>
\nTODD WHITE 30311 41.19%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nJANELLE K. HORNE 40547 58.55%<\/strong>
\nTODD WHITE 28539 41.21%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192 53.5 %
\nJANELLE K. HORNE 32268 58.41%<\/strong>
\nTODD WHITE 22842 41.35%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 41635
\nJANELLE K. HORNE 24503 58.85%<\/strong>
\nTODD WHITE 17040 40.93%<\/p>\n

\n

City of Placerville – City Council<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop \u00a03 win<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 4079\/6061\u00a067.3 %<\/strong>
\nLENA JORDAN CULL 1078 12.39%
\nJOHN L. CLERICI 1493 17.15%
\nERIN YOUNG 1304 14.98%
\nKARA TAYLOR 1533 17.61%
\nDENNIS THOMAS 1569 18.03%
\nPATRICIA BORELLI 1697 19.50%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 3925\/6061\u00a064.8 %<\/strong>
\nLENA JORDAN CULL 1041 12.35%
\nJOHN L. CLERICI 1454 17.25%
\nERIN YOUNG 1262 14.98%
\nKARA TAYLOR 1474 17.49%
\nDENNIS THOMAS 1519 18.03%
\nPATRICIA BORELLI 1648 19.56%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 3235\/6061 53.4 %
\nLENA JORDAN CULL 875 12.40%
\nJOHN L. CLERICI 1212 17.18%
\nERIN YOUNG 1075 15.24%
\nKARA TAYLOR 1230 17.44%
\nDENNIS THOMAS 1253 17.76%<\/strong>
\nPATRICIA BORELLI 1392 19.73%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 2472\/6061 40.8 %
\nTotal Votes 5481
\nLENA JORDAN CULL 674 12.30%
\nJOHN L. CLERICI 951 17.35%<\/strong>
\nERIN YOUNG 817 14.91%
\nKARA TAYLOR 942 17.19%
\nDENNIS THOMAS 973 17.75%<\/strong>
\nPATRICIA BORELLI 1114 20.32%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

City of South Lake Tahoe – City Council<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 3 win<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 6609\/10959\u00a060.3 %<\/strong>
\nHAL COLE 1566 9.66%
\nPATRICK F. JARRETT 626 3.86%
\nWENDY DAVID 2024 12.49%
\nTOM DAVIS 1269 7.83%
\nTAMARA WALLACE 2368 14.61%
\nDEVIN MIDDLEBROOK 3081 19.01%<\/strong>
\nAUSTIN C. SASS 823 5.08%
\nBRUCE GREGO 1558 9.61%
\nCODY BASS 2844 17.54%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 6339\/10959\u00a057.8 %<\/strong>
\nHAL COLE 1511 9.71%
\nPATRICK F. JARRETT 608 3.91%
\nWENDY DAVID 1939 12.46%
\nTOM DAVIS 1208 7.76%
\nTAMARA WALLACE 2283 14.67%<\/strong>
\nDEVIN MIDDLEBROOK 2953 18.97%<\/strong>
\nAUSTIN C. SASS 789 5.07%
\nBRUCE GREGO 1506 9.68%
\nCODY BASS 2717 17.46%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 4684\/10959 42.7 %
\nHAL COLE 1156 9.99%
\nPATRICK F. JARRETT 472 4.08%
\nWENDY DAVID 1427 12.33%
\nTOM DAVIS 923 7.98%
\nTAMARA WALLACE 1716 14.83%<\/strong>
\nDEVIN MIDDLEBROOK 2102 18.17%<\/strong>
\nAUSTIN C. SASS 618 5.34%
\nBRUCE GREGO 1158 10.01%
\nCODY BASS 1957 16.92%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL\u00a0– Times Counted 2918\/10959 26.6 %
\nTotal Votes 7387
\nHAL COLE 767 10.38%
\nPATRICK F. JARRETT 298 4.03%
\nWENDY DAVID 914 12.37%
\nTOM DAVIS 591 8.00%
\nTAMARA WALLACE 1148 15.54%
\nDEVIN MIDDLEBROOK 1309 17.72%<\/strong>
\nAUSTIN C. SASS 396 5.36%
\nBRUCE GREGO 755 10.22%
\nCODY BASS 1181 15.99%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

El Dorado Irrigation District – Division 2 Director<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 1 wins<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 13397\/18374\u00a072.9 %<\/strong>
\nPAT DWYER 7251 66.76%<\/strong>
\nGREG PRADA 3564 32.81%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 12214\/18374\u00a066.5 %<\/strong>
\nPAT DWYER 6589 66.33%<\/strong>
\nGREG PRADA 3298 33.20%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 9764\/18374\u00a053.1 %<\/strong>
\nPAT DWYER 5315 66.10%<\/strong>
\nGREG PRADA 2689 33.44%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 7741\/18374\u00a042.1 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 6431
\nPAT DWYER 4225 65.70%<\/strong>
\nGREG PRADA 2177 33.85%<\/p>\n

\n

El Dorado Irrigation District – Division 4 Director<\/strong><\/u>
\nTop 1 wins<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 11790\/16285\u00a072.4 %<\/strong>
\nDALE COCO 4032 41.16%
\nLORI ANZINI 5717 58.36%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 11360\/16285\u00a069.8 %<\/strong>
\nDALE COCO 3891 41.17%
\nLORI ANZINI 5519 58.40%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 8752\/16285\u00a053.7 %<\/strong>
\nDALE COCO 3008 40.81%
\nLORI ANZINI 4337 58.84%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 6514\/16285\u00a040.0 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 5529
\nDALE COCO 2257 40.82%
\nLORI ANZINI 3252 58.82%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure J – County TOT<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 35589 44.07%
\nNO 45162 55.93%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 33599 44.24%
\nNO 42341 55.76%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 26704 44.21%
\nNO 33696 55.79%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 45584
\nYES 20512 45.00%
\nNO 25072 55.00%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure N – County Cannabis<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 52015 64.87%<\/strong>
\nNO 28173 35.13%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 48982 64.96%<\/strong>
\nNO 26421 35.04%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 38800 64.68%<\/strong>
\nNO 21188 35.32%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 45277
\nYES 29894 66.02%<\/strong>
\nNO 15383 33.98%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure P – County Cannabis<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 48587 60.64%<\/strong>
\nNO 31541 39.36%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 45741 60.71%<\/strong>
\nNO 29608 39.29%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192 53.5 %
\nYES 36212 60.41%<\/strong>
\nNO 23728 39.59%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192 40.2 %
\nTotal Votes 45216
\nYES 27829 61.55%<\/strong>
\nNO 17387 38.45%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure Q – County Cannabis<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 47360 59.29%<\/strong>
\nNO 32516 40.71%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 44557 59.33%<\/strong>
\nNO 30547 40.67%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 35264 59.04%<\/strong>
\nNO 24461 40.96%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 45054
\nYES 27095 60.14%<\/strong>
\nNO 17959 39.86%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure R – County Cannabis<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 48660 61.25%<\/strong>
\nNO 30786 38.75%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 45731 61.23%<\/strong>
\nNO 28961 38.77%%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 36175 60.87%<\/strong>
\nNO 23256 39.13%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 44837
\nYES 27777 61.95%<\/strong>
\nNO 17060 38.05%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure S – County Cannabis<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 47319 60.03%<\/strong>
\nNO 31507 39.97%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 44477 60.01%<\/strong>
\nNO 29645 39.99%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 35175 59.65%<\/strong>
\nNO 23792 40.35%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 44477
\nYES 27011 60.73%<\/strong>
\nNO 17466 39.27%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure U – County Charter<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 18256 23.28%
\nNO 60179 76.72%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 17167 23.27%
\nNO 56604 76.73%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192 53.5 %
\nYES 13888 23.64%
\nNO 44857 76.36%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 44405
\nYES 10480 23.60%
\nNO 33925 76.40%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Measure V – County Charter<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 87009\/121192\u00a071.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 30890 41.64%
\nNO 43285 58.36%<\/strong><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 81743\/121192\u00a067.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 29107 41.69%
\nNO 40705 58.31%<\/strong><\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 64824\/121192\u00a053.5 %<\/strong>
\nYES 23421 41.93%
\nNO 32430 58.07%<\/strong><\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 48697\/121192\u00a040.2 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 42304
\nYES 18190 43.00%
\nNO 24114 57.00%<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure M – City of Placerville<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 4079\/6061\u00a067.3 %<\/strong>
\nYES 2493 67.52%<\/strong>
\nNO 1199 32.48%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 3925\/6061\u00a064.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 2390 67.30%<\/strong>
\nNO 1161 32.70%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 3235\/6061\u00a053.4 %<\/strong>
\nYES 1968 67.17%<\/strong>
\nNO 962 32.83%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 2472\/6061\u00a040.8 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 2248
\nYES 1522 67.70%<\/strong>
\nNO 726 32.30%<\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Measure T – City of South Lake Tahoe<\/strong><\/u><\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2
\nTimes Counted 6609\/10959\u00a060.3 %<\/strong>
\nYES 3265 50.45%<\/strong>
\nNO 3207 49.55%<\/p>\n

ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1
\nTimes Counted 6339\/10959\u00a057.8 %<\/strong>
\nYES 3115 50.20%<\/strong>
\nNO 3090 49.80%<\/p>\n

UNOFFICIAL ELECTION NIGHT FINAL REPORT
\nTimes Counted 4684\/10959\u00a042.7 %<\/strong>
\nYES 2345 51.23%<\/strong>
\nNO 2232 48.77%<\/p>\n

VOTE BY MAIL –\u00a0Times Counted 2918\/10959\u00a026.6 %<\/strong>
\nTotal Votes 2838
\nYES 1439 50.70%<\/strong>
\nNO 1399 49.30%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PR Pond] ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #2 Date:11\/14\/18, Time:16:35:56 Registered Voters 121192 –\u00a0Cards Cast 8700971.79% ELECTION UPDATE REPORT #1<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"featured_image_urls":{"full":"","thumbnail":"","medium":"","medium_large":"","large":"","1536x1536":"","2048x2048":"","darknews-slider-full":"","darknews-featured":"","darknews-medium":"","darknews-medium-square":""},"author_info":{"display_name":"News MoLo","author_link":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/author\/admin\/"},"category_info":"News<\/a>","tag_info":"News","comment_count":"0","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8548"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8549,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8548\/revisions\/8549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.newsmolo.com\/EDC\/2019\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}